<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Seeing the fnords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fnords.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Truth lies between the code lines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud: autoregistration features by Dolly</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/ubuntu-enterprise-cloud-autoregistration-features/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=222#comment-3444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am trying to install UEC from Ubuntu 10.04 server amd64 iso, but unfortunately i am not getting the option of &quot;install UEC&quot;. Can anyone suggest me the appropriate iso, so that i can install UEC. I tried to install it from 12.04 server iso, but it also didnt work.
can anybody help regarding this.

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to install UEC from Ubuntu 10.04 server amd64 iso, but unfortunately i am not getting the option of &#8220;install UEC&#8221;. Can anyone suggest me the appropriate iso, so that i can install UEC. I tried to install it from 12.04 server iso, but it also didnt work.<br />
can anybody help regarding this.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Agile vs. Open by Jean-Pierre Dion</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/agile-vs-open/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean-Pierre Dion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=574#comment-3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Thierry,
What you are describing is what we are doing in XLcloud (www.xlcloud.org). Well, more or less. 
Because we have nine teams in different locations, and some are working with Agile methodology (some full with a high level expertise, some light...) and others not. 
And our project is open source. So we are contributing or on the way to contribute to some open source projects such as OpenStack (which is an important component in our project).
We use tools such as Jira in a Sprint-oriented process to help us track what we do in an open source philosophy.
In the end that all works quite well and we enhance the process along the time. I would like to say that we take the best of those both ways to work.
Regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thierry,<br />
What you are describing is what we are doing in XLcloud (www.xlcloud.org). Well, more or less.<br />
Because we have nine teams in different locations, and some are working with Agile methodology (some full with a high level expertise, some light&#8230;) and others not.<br />
And our project is open source. So we are contributing or on the way to contribute to some open source projects such as OpenStack (which is an important component in our project).<br />
We use tools such as Jira in a Sprint-oriented process to help us track what we do in an open source philosophy.<br />
In the end that all works quite well and we enhance the process along the time. I would like to say that we take the best of those both ways to work.<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grizzly, the day after by Thierry Carrez</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/grizzly-the-day-after/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thierry Carrez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=1010#comment-3328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s totally true. The pre-RC1 bugfixing period is actually not &quot;blockers only&quot;: anything can be fixed. We just use the blockers as a measure of when we are ready to push a RC1. If you look at the Nova stats for example, we started with 30 blockers but fixed 200 bugs before pushing RC1. With a volunteer group and the strong incentive to &quot;scratch your own itch&quot;, you usually achieve a good balance between &quot;must fix&quot; and &quot;want to fix&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s totally true. The pre-RC1 bugfixing period is actually not &#8220;blockers only&#8221;: anything can be fixed. We just use the blockers as a measure of when we are ready to push a RC1. If you look at the Nova stats for example, we started with 30 blockers but fixed 200 bugs before pushing RC1. With a volunteer group and the strong incentive to &#8220;scratch your own itch&#8221;, you usually achieve a good balance between &#8220;must fix&#8221; and &#8220;want to fix&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grizzly, the day after by Yaniv</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/grizzly-the-day-after/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yaniv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=1010#comment-3325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An emphasis on &#039;blockers only&#039; early in the process (read: when users just began testing)  means that medium-high bugs are largely ignored or at best,  deferred.  This may lead to a mediocre release, even though it does not have blockers. I&#039;m not saying this is the situation, just that we need to be careful not to go into a  &#039;if there are no blockers,  all&#039;s well&#039; mode.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An emphasis on &#8216;blockers only&#8217; early in the process (read: when users just began testing)  means that medium-high bugs are largely ignored or at best,  deferred.  This may lead to a mediocre release, even though it does not have blockers. I&#8217;m not saying this is the situation, just that we need to be careful not to go into a  &#8216;if there are no blockers,  all&#8217;s well&#8217; mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UDS is dead, long live ODS by Thierry Carrez</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/uds-is-dead-long-live-ods/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thierry Carrez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=995#comment-3193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also see complementary viewpoint at: http://open.knome.fi/2013/03/04/is-uds-no-longer-uds/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also see complementary viewpoint at: <a href="http://open.knome.fi/2013/03/04/is-uds-no-longer-uds/" rel="nofollow">http://open.knome.fi/2013/03/04/is-uds-no-longer-uds/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bleeding edge OpenStack Nova on Maverick (updated x2) by arvind babu</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/bleeding-edge-openstack-nova-on-maverick/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arvind babu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=495#comment-3190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can u please tell me how do design and deploy apps into openstack cloud.....i read u r cloud installation step of openstack it says that it can only create instances .....not more than that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can u please tell me how do design and deploy apps into openstack cloud&#8230;..i read u r cloud installation step of openstack it says that it can only create instances &#8230;..not more than that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The real problem with Java in Linux distros by fdfasdm</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2010/09/24/the-real-problem-with-java-in-linux-distros/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fdfasdm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=434#comment-3173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[java is corporate because of the &quot;education purposes&quot; very similar to $$MS&#039;s corporate representation...  but they even went further and bought government officials to push their rubbish and tie everyone to their pocket... 

your article is biased]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>java is corporate because of the &#8220;education purposes&#8221; very similar to $$MS&#8217;s corporate representation&#8230;  but they even went further and bought government officials to push their rubbish and tie everyone to their pocket&#8230; </p>
<p>your article is biased</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Run your own Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, part 1 by asweng</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/run-your-own-uec-part-1/#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asweng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-3160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi everybody
i try to build private cloud using UEC with eucalyptus cd install i implemented in two mechine one contain CLC,SC,CC,Walrus and the other contain node controller i am using ubuntu 11.04 LTS eucalyptus 2.02 version

The networking in cloud implemented with two networks – private and public. The public network would be accessible to users and administrators from the “outside world”, and the private network is reserved for the backend communication, and is private for the cloud(between NCs and CLC mechine)
my problem is the two mechine(i m using 2 labtop) have one NIC eth0 its ok for node because i need one interface for private network but the problem is with CLC mechine need 2 interface eth0 (used with public)and eth1( used with private to communicate with node)
the other problem is how to bring internet connection to CLC mechine as i follow UEC guide it shoud assign a static ip addres to eth0 which is the ip address of cloud but i cant used static addres because i cant get internet connection in this case .


i got internet connection from my ISP through LAN local area connection and set a VPN with user name a passward that ISP gave me and use dhcp so i dont have a static ip address , this is on my other labtop which i used it to coonect to internet .

so how i can implement clc in mechine with one NIC , and how i can bring intetnet access to it . what shoud i do]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi everybody<br />
i try to build private cloud using UEC with eucalyptus cd install i implemented in two mechine one contain CLC,SC,CC,Walrus and the other contain node controller i am using ubuntu 11.04 LTS eucalyptus 2.02 version</p>
<p>The networking in cloud implemented with two networks – private and public. The public network would be accessible to users and administrators from the “outside world”, and the private network is reserved for the backend communication, and is private for the cloud(between NCs and CLC mechine)<br />
my problem is the two mechine(i m using 2 labtop) have one NIC eth0 its ok for node because i need one interface for private network but the problem is with CLC mechine need 2 interface eth0 (used with public)and eth1( used with private to communicate with node)<br />
the other problem is how to bring internet connection to CLC mechine as i follow UEC guide it shoud assign a static ip addres to eth0 which is the ip address of cloud but i cant used static addres because i cant get internet connection in this case .</p>
<p>i got internet connection from my ISP through LAN local area connection and set a VPN with user name a passward that ISP gave me and use dhcp so i dont have a static ip address , this is on my other labtop which i used it to coonect to internet .</p>
<p>so how i can implement clc in mechine with one NIC , and how i can bring intetnet access to it . what shoud i do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Run your own Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, part 1 by asweng</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/run-your-own-uec-part-1/#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asweng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-3159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dear sir
 
how can i bring internet access to CLC mechine ? how to set up LAN between clc and nc 
please help i cant finsh installation because of internet access 

thank you in advance]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear sir</p>
<p>how can i bring internet access to CLC mechine ? how to set up LAN between clc and nc<br />
please help i cant finsh installation because of internet access </p>
<p>thank you in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Run your own Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, part 1 by Ajinkya</title>
		<link>http://fnords.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/run-your-own-uec-part-1/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ajinkya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fnords.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-3144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,
I am tryeng to install node controller. But it is not detecting Cloud controller running on the network. Please help me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I am tryeng to install node controller. But it is not detecting Cloud controller running on the network. Please help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
